Dear Parishioners,
Recently I posted an article on Facebook by Cardinal George of Chicago in support of “traditional” marriage. The following is part of a response that I
received from someone I know (who went to Wildwood Catholic High School with me): “I believe
. . . that you don't intend to attack anyone here. And while your writing is thoughtful, it's
woefully misinformed. The church is
sadly wrong in this issue, as it's been on nearly all issues involving human
sexuality for years.”
Lest I am labeled by those too quick to judge with some unkind epithet because I am not being
considerate or sensitive to the difficulties that homosexual couples face in
our society, I think that it is only fair that I be given a hearing first. Why do I believe in “traditional” marriage
and stand by the position that I have taken?
Let me explain.
First, there are two
major presuppositions that I make.
As a Christian I believe that
the Bible is the inspired Word of God and is meant to teach us
and guide us. This belief should, in
theory, be true for all who profess
to be Christian—not just me. Next, I
believe that Jesus is the Son of God and His teaching matters more
than any other because of His Divine
Authority. What the Son of God has to say about a matter is
certainly more significant than what I—one of His lowly creatures—has to say.
Let’s look now at a passage from the Gospel of St. Mathew where Jesus
teaches on divorce:
Some Pharisees approached [Jesus], and tested him, saying, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any cause whatever?” He said in reply, “Have you not read that from the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female’ and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore, what God has joined together, no human being must separate.” (Mt. 19: 3-6)
Notice how in this passage Jesus
refers to the Book of Genesis
containing the story of the first human beings who were created by God as male and female (Gn. 1: 27). Next, He
refers to a joining together of these two humans—one male and one female—by
God in a one flesh experience
(Gn. 2: 24).
It seems pretty obvious to me from
this passage (supported by other Biblical teaching) that Jesus is affirming what we consider the “traditional”
position on marriage which society has presumably followed since the beginning
of the human race. And the foundation of
Jesus’ teaching here is based on the authority of Sacred Scripture as He reads it
and explains it.
I have explained in another of my writings why homosexual acts are both sterile
and empty (while granting that they
may be pleasurable) and contrary to
the very design of the human body. In
essence, there is no fruitfulness (i.e., a child)
ever possible as a result of a sexual act (a one flesh experience) between a
male and another male or a female and
another female.
I do not write this particular column to sit in judgment of anyone or to be seen as someone unsympathetic to the various struggles that people with homosexual attraction encounter. So if someone wants to condemn me for
the position that I take here, I take consolation that I am following what
appears to me to be the position that Jesus articulated through His reading and
explanation of Sacred Scripture.
Overwhelmingly, society has honored and upheld this “traditional”
marriage relationship through the centuries and the Church continues to defend
it—even when it seems unpopular or counter-cultural.
There is another passage from the
Sacred Scriptures that I also think is relevant to the matter at hand:
Blessed are you when they insult you and persecute you and utter every kind of evil against you [falsely] because of me. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward will be great in heaven. Thus they persecuted the prophets who were before you. (Mt. 5: 11-12)
No one ever said that it would be easy or popular to preach
and teach the Word of God.
I’ll take my chances, however, siding with Jesus and His Church.
Fr. Ed Namiotka
Pastor
No comments:
Post a Comment